tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10624981.post8428238722181550460..comments2024-03-02T05:18:13.619-05:00Comments on standBy Bert: Re: The Tasteful Public Nudity of Your ChildElizabeth Cranehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12506529878062016297noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10624981.post-35965217575068800142008-05-02T12:02:00.000-04:002008-05-02T12:02:00.000-04:00Good one, Josh.Good one, Josh.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10624981.post-41297247315161382602008-04-29T13:29:00.000-04:002008-04-29T13:29:00.000-04:00Weird. When Annie took my portrait she was quite i...Weird. When Annie took my portrait she was quite insistent on there being no nudity. I thought she was kind of a prude. Especially when I started to take my shirt off and she yelled, "Nobody wants to see that!" I guess artists have visions. Yeah. That must be it.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10624981.post-30882862694211792222008-04-29T11:25:00.000-04:002008-04-29T11:25:00.000-04:00i finally saw it. i think that some reasons it can...i finally saw it. i think that some reasons it can be disturbing are:<BR/><BR/>1. it's dark. i just got a very dark, sort of goth-y vibe. god forbid anyone look at her in any other way than 'hannah montana.' what/whomever that is.<BR/><BR/>2. also, she looks like a woman. and it's not entirely because she has a naked back. the look in her eyes, the hair. it's not even entirely sexy so much as brooding or dark or serious. again, when we eff up people's perceptions, they get really threatened/mad.smussyolayhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01143163489097921644noreply@blogger.com